Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Darwin Blanch vs Marco Miceli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Blanch vs Miceli analysis and find out who is favored!
Darwin Blanch vs Marco Miceli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Blanch has won 49.24% of points on his second serve, while Miceli has won 37.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Blanch, in recent form, has won 50.19% of his opponent's second serve points, while Miceli has won 47.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.57% and 39.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Blanch has saved 54.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Miceli has saved 46.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Blanch has won 42.31% of matches played (W/L 11/ 15), with Miceli winning 43.75% (W/L 14/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Blanch has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 14/ 13), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12). Miceli has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 42/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Blanch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 10), where as Miceli has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 14/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Blanch winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Blanch winning 2 and Miceli winning 1. The last match between Blanch and Miceli was at the M15 Telde, 09-04-2024, First, Clay with Darwin Blanch getting the victory 7-6(5) 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Blanch and Miceli have played a deciding set 1 times, with Blanch winning 1 times and Miceli 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Blanch winning 1, and Miceli 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Blanch has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.38 while Miceli has played against players with an average rank of 214.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Blanch has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Miceli has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Blanch has converted 46.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Miceli has converted 47.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Blanch 1 - 0 Miceli
N/A
Rank
High
16
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
898
Rank
580
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
51% (26-25)
Career Total W/L
50% (181-184)
47% (9-10)
YTD W/L
33% (4-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Darwin Blanch | Marco Miceli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:30:0 | 2:30:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (65/99) | 61% (62/101) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (41/65) | 60% (37/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (17/34) | 46% (18/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (46/101) | 41% (41/99) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Darwin Blanch
Player
Marco Miceli
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Darwin Blanch | Marco Miceli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (9/10) | 33% (4/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (21/26) | 38% (11/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (203/228) | 45% (125/152) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 33% (4/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 37 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 28 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:38 | 1:28:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 314.05 | 180.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (888/1351) | 69% (459/663) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (576/888) | 57% (262/459) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (228/463) | 37% (76/204) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (51/110) | 47% (33/70) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (517/1351) | 42% (286/674) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 56% (9/7) | 33% (4/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (9/19) | 33% (4/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 14% (7/1) |
Darwin Blanch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Darwin Blanch
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Darwin Blanch
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Darwin Blanch
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Albert Pedrico Kravtsov
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
35 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(3) 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Benoit Torcq
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Peter Fajta
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Darwin Blanch
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Marco Miceli
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Darwin Blanch
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
77%
(
53 of
69)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Darwin Blanch
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marco Miceli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yuvan Nandal
Player
Marco Miceli
56%
(
69 of
124)
1st Serve %
79%
(
84 of
106)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
42%
(
23 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
62 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
117
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Marco Miceli
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Marco Miceli
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
80%
(
37 of
46)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Marco Miceli
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Marco Miceli
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Miceli
Player
Radovan Michalik
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Miceli
Player
Farzan Amiri
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniele Minighini
Player
Marco Miceli
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Marco Miceli
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Perfetti
Player
Marco Miceli
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-7(2) 6-0 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Blanch Vs Miceli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
